Estimation of effect size distribution from genome-wide association studies and implications for future discoveries

JH Park, S Wacholder, MH Gail, U Peters, KB Jacobs… - Nature …, 2010 - nature.com
JH Park, S Wacholder, MH Gail, U Peters, KB Jacobs, SJ Chanock, N Chatterjee
Nature genetics, 2010nature.com
We report a set of tools to estimate the number of susceptibility loci and the distribution of
their effect sizes for a trait on the basis of discoveries from existing genome-wide association
studies (GWASs). We propose statistical power calculations for future GWASs using
estimated distributions of effect sizes. Using reported GWAS findings for height, Crohn's
disease and breast, prostate and colorectal (BPC) cancers, we determine that each of these
traits is likely to harbor additional loci within the spectrum of low-penetrance common …
Abstract
We report a set of tools to estimate the number of susceptibility loci and the distribution of their effect sizes for a trait on the basis of discoveries from existing genome-wide association studies (GWASs). We propose statistical power calculations for future GWASs using estimated distributions of effect sizes. Using reported GWAS findings for height, Crohn's disease and breast, prostate and colorectal (BPC) cancers, we determine that each of these traits is likely to harbor additional loci within the spectrum of low-penetrance common variants. These loci, which can be identified from sufficiently powerful GWASs, together could explain at least 15–20% of the known heritability of these traits. However, for BPC cancers, which have modest familial aggregation, our analysis suggests that risk models based on common variants alone will have modest discriminatory power (63.5% area under curve), even with new discoveries.
nature.com