MRI as a biomarker of disease progression in a therapeutic trial of milameline for AD

CR Jack Jr, M Slomkowski, S Gracon, TM Hoover… - Neurology, 2003 - AAN Enterprises
CR Jack Jr, M Slomkowski, S Gracon, TM Hoover, JP Felmlee, K Stewart, Y Xu, M Shiung…
Neurology, 2003AAN Enterprises
Objective: To assess the feasibility of using MRI measurements as a surrogate endpoint for
disease progression in a therapeutic trial for AD. Methods: A total of 362 patients with
probable AD from 38 different centers participated in the MRI portion of a 52-week
randomized placebo-controlled trial of milameline, a muscarinic receptor agonist. The
therapeutic trial itself was not completed due to projected lack of efficacy on interim analysis;
however, the MRI arm of the study was continued. Of the 362 subjects who underwent a …
Objective: To assess the feasibility of using MRI measurements as a surrogate endpoint for disease progression in a therapeutic trial for AD.
Methods: A total of 362 patients with probable AD from 38 different centers participated in the MRI portion of a 52-week randomized placebo-controlled trial of milameline, a muscarinic receptor agonist. The therapeutic trial itself was not completed due to projected lack of efficacy on interim analysis; however, the MRI arm of the study was continued. Of the 362 subjects who underwent a baseline MRI study, 192 subjects underwent a second MRI 1 year later. Hippocampal volume and temporal horn volume were measured from the MRI scans.
Results: The annualized percent changes in hippocampal volume (−4.9%) and temporal horn volume (16.1%) in the study patients were consistent with data from prior single-site studies. Correlations between the rate of MRI volumetric change and change in behavioral/cognitive measures were greater for the temporal horn than for the hippocampus. Decline over time was more consistently seen with imaging measures, 99% of the time for the hippocampus, than behavioral/cognitive measures (p < 0.001). Greater consistency in MRI than behavioral/clinical measures resulted in markedly lower estimated sample size requirements for clinical trials. The estimated number of subjects per arm required to detect a 50% reduction in the rate of decline over 1 year are: AD Assessment Scale–cognitive subscale 320; Mini-Mental Status Examination 241; hippocampal volume 21; temporal horn volume 54.
Conclusion: The consistency of MRI measurements obtained across sites, and the consistency between the multisite milameline data and that obtained in prior single-site studies, demonstrate the technical feasibility of using structural MRI measures as a surrogate endpoint of disease progression in therapeutic trials. However, validation of imaging as a biomarker of therapeutic efficacy in AD awaits a positive trial.
American Academy of Neurology