[HTML][HTML] Induction of albuminuria in mice: synergistic effect of two monoclonal antibodies directed to different domains of aminopeptidase A

S Mentzel, JPHF Van Son, HBPM Dijkman… - Kidney international, 1999 - Elsevier
S Mentzel, JPHF Van Son, HBPM Dijkman, JFM Wetzels, KJM Assmann
Kidney international, 1999Elsevier
Induction of albuminuria in mice: Synergistic effect of two monoclonal antibodies directed to
different domains of aminopeptidase A. Background Aminopeptidase A is an enzyme that is
present on podocytes and is involved in the degradation of angiotensin II. In previous
studies in mice, we administered single monoclonal antibodies directed against
aminopeptidase A. We observed that only monoclonal antibodies that inhibited
aminopeptidase A enzyme activity caused albuminuria. Methods In this study, the effects of …
Induction of albuminuria in mice: Synergistic effect of two monoclonal antibodies directed to different domains of aminopeptidase A.
Background
Aminopeptidase A is an enzyme that is present on podocytes and is involved in the degradation of angiotensin II. In previous studies in mice, we administered single monoclonal antibodies directed against aminopeptidase A. We observed that only monoclonal antibodies that inhibited aminopeptidase A enzyme activity caused albuminuria.
Methods
In this study, the effects of the combined injections of two monoclonal anti-aminopeptidase A antibodies (mAbs) were studied, using a combination of anti-aminopeptidase A mAbs that were directed against two different domains involved in the aminopeptidase A enzyme activity (ASD-3 or ASD-37) and an anti-aminopeptidase A mAb not related to the enzyme active site (ASD-41).
Results
An injection of the combinations ASD-3/37 (total 4 mg, 1:1 ratio) and ASD-37/41 (total 4 mg, 1:1 ratio) in doses that do not cause albuminuria when given alone (4 mg) induced massive albuminuria at day 1 after injection. The combination ASD-3/41 had no effect. This albuminuria was not dependent on systemic immune mediators of inflammation and could not merely be related to a blockade of aminopeptidase A enzyme activity. However, a correlation was observed between the induction of albuminuria and the aggregation of the mAbs injected and aminopeptidase A on the podocytes. An injection of the combinations ASD-3/37 or ASD-37/41 did not cause an increase in systemic blood pressure. The treatment with a combination of enalapril and losartan lowered blood pressure (53 ± 10 vs. 90 ± 3 mm Hg in untreated mice) and reduced the acute albuminuria by 55% (11,145 ± 864 vs. 24,517 ± 2448 μg albumin/18 hr in untreated mice). However, similar effects were observed using triple therapy. Therefore, the reduction of albuminuria by the combined treatment of enalapril/losartan seems to be the consequence of the reduction in the systemic blood pressure. These findings argue against a specific role for angiotensin II in this model.
Conclusions
The combined injection of two mAbs directed against different domains of aminopeptidase A induces a massive albuminuria in mice, which is not merely dependent on angiotensin II. We hypothesize that the direct binding of mAbs to at least two pathogenic domains on aminopeptidase A triggers the podocyte to release mediators that are involved in the observed albuminuria.
Elsevier